There’s a lot of hype about orchestration these days. It’s become a catch-all phrase and a popular term to market to IT audiences, as they scramble for a one-stop solution for managing today’s complex IT transformations.
Tools abound across the industry to help automate specific tasks associated with managing of data, process, applications and infrastructure.
While still others claim that they can orchestrate the dynamic flow of applications, data and infrastructure.
So, what’s the difference between orchestration and automation? (Or maybe even more important, why does it matter?)
The definition of automation is setting up a single task to run on its own – automating one thing. This single task can be anything from launching a web server, stopping a service, or invoking a call to initiate a failover event.
The main difference between a workflow “automation” and an “orchestration” (in the context of cloud
computing) is that workflows are processed and completed as processes within a single domain for automation purposes, whereas true orchestration manages the flow of data and a workflow of both human and automated tasks directed towards larger goals and objectives.
Orchestration vs Automation: The Difference Matters.
True orchestration is powerful because it can tie together multiple automated and manual processes, and actually accelerate project velocity. But it’s also essential to manage today’s dynamic IT environment:
These two levels of coordination – the flow of data and the sequencing of human and machine tasks – bring people and process from both the business and the IT side of the table together to create a unified system for managing IT transformation.
So when vendors claim their tool can orchestrate, take a moment to think about what you really need. And what they can really deliver.
See how TransitionManager can orchestrate your next IT transformation: